Reorder headers to follow the Google C++ Style Guide:
> In dir/foo.cc or dir/foo_test.cc:
>
> 1. dir2/foo2.h.
> 2. A blank line
> 3. C system headers (more precisely: headers in angle brackets with
the .h extension), e.g., <unistd.h>, <stdlib.h>.
> 4. A blank line
> 5. C++ standard library headers (without file extension), e.g.,
<algorithm>, <cstddef>.
> 6. A blank line
> 7. Other libraries' .h files.
> 8. A blank line
> 9. Your project's .h files.
https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html#Names_and_Order_of_Includes
This feeds into efforts to create a working install target.
The order of headers is still funky, and was "fixed" by clang-format,
but in a way that doesn't exactly align with the style guide. Further
cleanup of header order is coming in a follow-up PR.
This is a more faithful implementation of more_rbsp_data().
There could be trailing null bytes in NAL units. This isn't valid per
H264 specification, but the referenced bug includes a sample where the
PPS in the avcC record includes a trailing null byte.
Workaround the problem so packager does not fail.
A similar problem is workarounded in Chrome:
https://codereview.chromium.org/1107593004Closes#418
Change-Id: I28cb8a9371945dc094f766c3e559d7a66859b451
In H265Parser::ParseSliceHeader, the parser does not handle
byte_alignment() from the spec. byte_alignment() reportedly contains
at least one bit, which is not handled right now.
See Section 7.3.2.12 Rec. ITU-T H.265 v3 (04/2015).
Also added a few size sanity checks in H265Parser to make sure the
code does not crash if an invalid input is provided.
Fixes#383.
Change-Id: I33b31396058fc5ba67a0fc119be5fe56ec9443b0
Joey Parrish
KongQun Yang