127 lines
3.2 KiB
Protocol Buffer
127 lines
3.2 KiB
Protocol Buffer
syntax = "proto3";
|
|
|
|
// These proto descriptors have at one time been reported as an issue or defect.
|
|
// They are kept here to replicate the issue, and continue to verify the fix.
|
|
|
|
// Issue: Non-"Google.Protobuffers" namespace will ensure that protobuffer library types are qualified
|
|
option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos";
|
|
|
|
package unittest_issues;
|
|
option optimize_for = SPEED;
|
|
|
|
// Issue 307: when generating doubly-nested types, any references
|
|
// should be of the form A.Types.B.Types.C.
|
|
message Issue307 {
|
|
message NestedOnce {
|
|
message NestedTwice {
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Old issue 13: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=13
|
|
// New issue 309: https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/309
|
|
|
|
// message A {
|
|
// optional int32 _A = 1;
|
|
// }
|
|
|
|
// message B {
|
|
// optional int32 B_ = 1;
|
|
// }
|
|
|
|
//message AB {
|
|
// optional int32 a_b = 1;
|
|
//}
|
|
|
|
// Similar issue with numeric names
|
|
// Java code failed too, so probably best for this to be a restriction.
|
|
// See https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/308
|
|
// message NumberField {
|
|
// optional int32 _01 = 1;
|
|
// }
|
|
|
|
// issue 19 - negative enum values
|
|
|
|
enum NegativeEnum {
|
|
NEGATIVE_ENUM_ZERO = 0;
|
|
FiveBelow = -5;
|
|
MinusOne = -1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
message NegativeEnumMessage {
|
|
NegativeEnum value = 1;
|
|
repeated NegativeEnum values = 2 [packed = false];
|
|
repeated NegativeEnum packed_values = 3 [packed=true];
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Issue 21: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=21
|
|
// Decorate fields with [deprecated=true] as [System.Obsolete]
|
|
|
|
message DeprecatedChild {
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
enum DeprecatedEnum {
|
|
DEPRECATED_ZERO = 0;
|
|
one = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
message DeprecatedFieldsMessage {
|
|
int32 PrimitiveValue = 1 [deprecated = true];
|
|
repeated int32 PrimitiveArray = 2 [deprecated = true];
|
|
|
|
DeprecatedChild MessageValue = 3 [deprecated = true];
|
|
repeated DeprecatedChild MessageArray = 4 [deprecated = true];
|
|
|
|
DeprecatedEnum EnumValue = 5 [deprecated = true];
|
|
repeated DeprecatedEnum EnumArray = 6 [deprecated = true];
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Issue 45: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=45
|
|
message ItemField {
|
|
int32 item = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
message ReservedNames {
|
|
// Force a nested type called Types
|
|
message SomeNestedType {
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int32 types = 1;
|
|
int32 descriptor = 2;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
message TestJsonFieldOrdering {
|
|
// These fields are deliberately not declared in numeric
|
|
// order, and the oneof fields aren't contiguous either.
|
|
// This allows for reasonably robust tests of JSON output
|
|
// ordering.
|
|
// TestFieldOrderings in unittest_proto3.proto is similar,
|
|
// but doesn't include oneofs.
|
|
// TODO: Consider adding oneofs to TestFieldOrderings, although
|
|
// that will require fixing other tests in multiple platforms.
|
|
// Alternatively, consider just adding this to
|
|
// unittest_proto3.proto if multiple platforms want it.
|
|
|
|
int32 plain_int32 = 4;
|
|
|
|
oneof o1 {
|
|
string o1_string = 2;
|
|
int32 o1_int32 = 5;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
string plain_string = 1;
|
|
|
|
oneof o2 {
|
|
int32 o2_int32 = 6;
|
|
string o2_string = 3;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
message TestJsonName {
|
|
// Message for testing the effects for of the json_name option
|
|
string name = 1;
|
|
string description = 2 [json_name = "desc"];
|
|
string guid = 3 [json_name = "exid"];
|
|
}
|